Restriction of TRUE SPEECH.
- “The Press will refrain from inappropriately sensational portrayal of violence, brutality and suffering” [German PresseKodex #11];
- “preservation of human dignity” [German PresseKodex #1];
- “the Press must exercise especial restraint reporting crimes committed by young persons” [German PresseKodex #13.3];
The seemingly innocuous media code rules #1 to 3 appear neutral, on the surface. These regulations mandate to withhold true information and thus the press code restricts true speech.
True speech is not permissible, restricted by a variety of media code regulations. Even we were unaware of this multitude of true speech restrictions, until we read the sanctions and reprimands of the German and Austrian Media Council.
And of course, there is PresseKodex #12.1, blatantly mandating restrictions to true speech based on color of skin (“minority” membership, in violation of non-discrimination mandate section #12)
- 4) it is not permissible to refer to the suspect‘s religious, ethnic or other minority membership 1 [GUIDELINE 12.1. by the German Press Council German Press Code]
Illusion of wholesome nice world
People who live in a safe and wholesome environment get shielded from knowledge about true cruelty of the outside world.
Such knowledge can be
- intellectual (which is repressed by PresseKodex 12.1 that censors race of criminals and prevents prejudice against more violent populations)
- emotional, by first hand or second hand witnessing true instances of crime, mayhem and cruelty. But this is prevented by PresseKodex 11 and 1 and German Penal Code 131.
If you live in Nairobi, Guatemala City, Lahore, or the worst Ghettos in the US, your personal experience, local gossip and local news give you a dose of reality. You encounter victims of shootings, accidents, you witness robberies, see violent bullying and more. If you live in Europe, USA, Australia, Canada you live in the good-white snowflake world: clueless about the brutal reality of the outside world and the life experience and attitudes of people that are accepted into their lands.
School Diversity, 3 black girls beat up white girl in school elevator
This video violates all 4 gag orders that make TRUE speech “not permissible”
1) it shows violence and brutality 2) it violates the human dignity of the victim 3) it reports crimes perpetrated by young people and 4) it shows the criminals’ ethnicity, black girls beating a white girl.
Portrayal of violence, brutality and suffering
For those curious about learning about uncensored brutality we will posted here Gore and Cruelty as Teachable Moments– TRIGGER WARNING. For more civilized examples of black violence we recommend to Google
Prize-winning journalist and book author Colin Flaherty’s social media accounts get regularly blocked and deleted. He violates media gag orders, shows Blacks sucker-punching Asians, Black melees in shopping centers, White kids getting punched by Blacks, and more. He aggregates the videos that don’t make it onto national TV due to all the media code restrictions.
In the German penal code, section 131, showing brutal truth is punishable with up to one year in prison2
Integration and Immigration
All these media restrictions have the very clear side effect of keeping the population ignorant about what truly happens in the world. This subverts the foundation of democracy, of the informed voter.
Uninformed population, voters and politicians cannot make informed decisions to consent
- to have crime prone populations (Disclaimer ) enter fairly crime and gore-free regions (like Europe). Such consent will significantly decrease with truthful graphic information about the cruel world outside their prosperous privileged white neighborhood cocoon.
- to integration with crime prone and gore prone minorities (Disclaimer ) that are already in the country (like African Americans, busing),
Privileged secure White neighborhood never had the experience of constant danger of robbery, car jacking, gang violence, lynching that are present in less privileged parts of the world.
Refrain from portrayal of violence and brutality (PresseKodex #11),
especially when perpetrated by disadvantaged minorities (PresseKodex #12.1)
Reprimands of the German and Austrian media council show this very clearly. Videos about school children getting seriously beaten, photos of a corpse with the stolen knife in the body, or of seriously injured people are reprimanded for being sensational or not respecting the human dignity of corpses or injured people. It just so happens that the perpetrators are, to a large extent, “disadvantaged minorities”, refugees, Muslims,, or African Americans. Or ISIS Jihadists:
Marine Le Pen Charged Over Sharing Images of ISIS Brutality
Mar 1, 2018 … French far-right leader Marine Le Pen was charged on Thursday … The crime is punishable by up to three years in prison and a fine of €75,000 (£66,000). …3
Oh insincerity. There are plenty of groups inciting terrorism, from Islamists to the Antifa. Certainly not Le Pen. So the accusation is probably regarding harm to human dignity. I fathom that most terror or robbery victims would rather have photos of their corpses published to serve as warning against their murderers, than hidden to preserve their posthumous human dignity. A beheading victim died of neck wounds, Swedish media said, “warning fellow Swedes not to share the graphic clip, informing that violation of the law may be punished with up to four years’ imprisonment.”4. Over-eagerly media and government over-fulfilled the media code request. Media lied by understating the gravity and cruelty of the crime and government put draconian penalties for those who divulge TRUE information.
Below we will link to sites with gratuitous gore and cruelty. Strangely, most of this happens in Africa, South and Central America, and Muslim countries, or in majority black or Muslim parts of town in US or Europe. Rarely gore happens in protected white (or model minority East Asian, Jewish, …) neighborhoods. (Disclaimer )
In ghettos, high crime countries people naturally encounter shot robbery victims, maimed traffic accident victims agonizing on the streets, corpses in lakes of blood, live robberies, and more. Almost everyone has a friend who was a crime victim, who got hurt or killed. Their friends and local news tell them horror stories.
==================== End of Summary ==================
Hiding Race of Criminals
Such seemingly innocuous and neutral media code regulations mislead the public. It is not just the blatant dishonesty of PresseKodex 12.1. REPORTS ON CRIMES When reporting crimes, it is not permissible to refer to the suspect‘s religious, ethnic or other minority membership 5
Sensational reporting of violence, brutality, and suffering
Other media code regulations also make sure that publication of TRUE INFORMATION gets repressed and reprimanded. It just so happens that this true information also makes “minorities” look better to avoid “prejudice” (which frequently is true6)
Section 11 SENSATIONAL REPORTING, THE PROTECTION OF YOUNG PEOPLE The Press will refrain from inappropriately sensational portrayal of violence, brutality and suffering. The Press shall respect the protection of young people. [Source: German PresseKodex English]
GUIDELINE 11.1 INAPPROPRIATE PORTRAYAL A report is inappropriately sensational if the person it covers is reduced to an object, to a mere thing. This is particularly so if reports about a dying or physically or mentally suffering person go beyond public interest and the readers‘ requirement for information. When placing pictorial representations of acts of violence and accidents on front pages, the Press shall respect the possible effects on children and young people. [Source: German PresseKodex English]
GUIDELINE 11.2 REPORTING ACTS OF VIOLENCE In reporting actual and threatened acts of violence, the Press should weigh carefully the public‘s interest in information against the interests of the victims and other people involved. It should report on such incidents in an independent and authentic way, but not allow itself to be made the tool of criminals. Nor should it undertake independent attempts to mediate between criminals and the police. There must be no interviews with perpetrators during acts of violence. [Source: German PresseKodex English]
GUIDELINE 11.3 ACCIDENTS AND DISASTERS The limit of acceptability in reports on accidents and disasters is respect for the suffering of the victims and the feelings of their dependents. Victims of misfortune must not be made to suffer a second time by their portrayal in the media.
Preserving Human Dignity by hiding ugliness of crime
Section 1 TRUTHFULNESS AND PRESERVING HUMAN DIGNITY Respect for the truth, preservation of human dignity and accurate informing of the public are the overriding principles of the Press. In this way, every person active in the Press preserves the standing and credibility of the media.
If truthfulness violates human dignity, truthfulness suffers. Serious crimes already violated human dignity. When terrorists blow off people’s limbs, violent mobs beat someone in a near death coma, the victim is not very much concerned with his or her human dignity. Rather, the non-reporting protects the human dignity of the criminals, like section 12.1.
Underage felons enjoy special protection (another mandatory gag order)
GUIDELINE 13.3 CRIMES COMMITTED BY YOUNG PERSONS When reporting on investigations and criminal court proceedings against young persons and on their appearance in court, the Press must exercise especial restraint out of consideration for their future. [Source: German PresseKodex English]
More truths that must not be published. The perfect protection for MUFL’s (German for minor unaccompanied refugees), underage NAFRIs7 repeat criminals.
School Bullying Terror
Interracial school bullying is covered up, not prevented. Vulnerable children of all races are forced into schools without protection against violence and rape by “historically underprivileged” youth. See the video further up in this post.
FOOTNOTES
- REPORTS ON CRIMES When reporting crimes, it is not permissible to refer to the suspect‘s religious, ethnic or other minority membership unless this information can be justified as being relevant to the readers‘ understanding of the incident. In particular, it must be borne in mind that such references could stir up prejudices against minorities. [GUIDELINE 12.1. by the German Press Council German Press Code: Guidelines for journalistic work as recommended by the German Press Council;
See also Media Speech Codes #2: Europe, Asia, Africa // Media Speech Codes #1: USA, Canada, Germany -
Section 131Dissemination of depictions of violence
(1) Whosoever
1. disseminates written materials (section 11(3)), which describe cruel or otherwise inhuman acts of violence against humans or humanoid beings in a manner expressing glorification or which downplays such acts of violence or which represents the cruel or inhuman aspects of the event in a manner which violates human dignity;
2. publicly displays, posts, presents, or otherwise makes them accessible;
3. offers, supplies or makes them accessible to a person under eighteen years; or
4. produces, obtains, supplies, stocks, offers, announces, commends, undertakes to import or export them, in order to use them or copies obtained from them within the meaning of numbers 1 to 3 above or facilitate such use by another,
shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding one year or a fine.
(2) Whosoever disseminates a presentation with a content indicated in subsection (1) above by radio, media services, or telecommunication services shall incur the same penalty.
(3) Subsections (1) and (2) above shall not apply in cases of reporting about current or historical events.
(4) Subsection (1) No 3 above shall not apply if the person authorised to care for another person acts; this shall not apply if that person grossly neglects his duty of education by offering, giving, or making them accessible.
§ 131 StGB – Gewaltdarstellung in German
- The move by a judge in Nanterre, just outside Paris, came after the National Assembly voted in November to strip the National Front president of her parliamentary immunity over the three photos of ISIS violence posted in 2015.
Immunity for politicians has the sole purpose to let them speak freely without fear and retribution. Preventing elected politicians from TRUE SPEECH is an even worse affront && to democracy than misinforming the voters by biased media and media codes.
Le Pen, who lost to Emmanuel Macron in last year’s presidential vote, is facing charges of circulating “violent messages that incite terrorism or pornography or seriously harm human dignity”, and that can be viewed by a minor. The crime is punishable by up to three years in prison and a fine of €75,000 (£66,000). [Source: Marine Le Pen Charged Over Sharing Images of ISIS Brutality]
-
Swedish National TV Under Fire for ‘Hushing Up’ Details of Hikers’ Brutal Murder [Amren]
Many viewers complained that the state broadcaster was more concerned by the video of the killing being spread than the grisly murders themselves. While one of the victims was decapitated alive in the style of Daesh* executions, SVT didn’t mention the beheading at all, instead merely reporting about “neck wounds”.
The clip is so brutal that many people who have watched it admit to it having a deep impact and regret having ever played it.[…]
“The murders in Morocco and the PC media: first, the fake media attempts to hush up the brutal execution in Morocco. When the people start sharing pictures of what happened, those who do so are threatened with several years’ imprisonment”, former Sweden Democrat leader Anders Klarström tweeted.
“I myself would never watch such a film, let alone share it. But now we are more upset about the crime of proliferation than the crime of beheading. PC people have once again upset the applecart for us”, another user wrote.
- REPORTS ON CRIMES When reporting crimes, it is not permissible to refer to the suspect‘s religious, ethnic or other minority membership unless this information can be justified as being relevant to the readers‘ understanding of the incident. In particular, it must be borne in mind that such references could stir up prejudices against minorities. [GUIDELINE 12.1. by the German Press Council German Press Code: Guidelines for journalistic work as recommended by the German Press Council;
See also
-
- Prejudice is correct, mostly: Research on Stereotype accuracy shows that prejudice is frequently correct, and that humans evolved to be good intuitive statisticians
Nafris is the pluralization of NAFRI, a German police abbreviation which stands for “NordAFRikanischer Intensivtäter” meaning “North African Intensive Offenders“.[1]Police in Cologne were accused of racial profiling, and of degrading North Africans by referring to them as “Nafris”, as they tried to avoid a repeat of the mass sexual assaults in the city.[2] [3] [4] [5]
Mr. Jürgen Mathies (head of police in Cologne), apologized publicly for a police tweet which referred to checks on “Nafris”,[6] but the term was already in use by German media before the tweet.[7][8] Nafris| Wikipedia