Instagram censors FBI crime statistic graph as hate speech

Factually correct #RacistFacts 1 violate social media community standards. 2. True crime statistics constitute hate speech if they are apt to stir up (correct) “prejudice” against protected “minorities”.  #TrueSpeech is Forbidden, True Facts are Taboo

Social media “community standards” don’t allow “content” that encourages hatred against protected groups.


“We are getting to the point where narratives are more important than truth.”

Facebook-owned Instagram is now censoring FBI crime statistic graphs as “hate speech,” according to Blaze TV’s Elijah Schaffer.

“Instagram is now removing FBI crime statistic graphs,” Schaffer said Saturday on Twitter. “Posted with the necessary citations [as] ‘hate speech.’”

“We are getting to the point where narratives are more important than truth,” Schaffer said. “And the truth when inconvenient makes you a hateful person. This is 1984.”



Instagram is now removing FBI crime statistic graphs
Posted with the necessary citations
As “hate speech”
We are getting to the point where narratives are more important than truth
And the truth when inconvenient makes you a hateful person
This is 1984


(Tweet backed up as screenshot3) This is the “hate graph” he posted, which is based off FBI crime stats from 2013:


This is the original link written on the graphic

When the FBI website will get censored in the future, we mirrored it at which can also serve as a shortlink!

It makes sense that Instagram would want it censored as it debunks the media’s entire false victimization narrative.


While Instagram has apparently deemed FBI crime stats off limits, Fox News and the Wall Street Journal are now running them on their front pages.

For example, Fox News included these lines in their headline article on Sunday titled, “Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey rejects city council’s push to defund police, despite veto-proof majority“:

Nationally, efforts to defund the police have been broadly unpopular, with only about 20 percent of Americans favoring reductions in police forces. Citing publicly available data, commentators have asserted that the very idea of systemic racism by police is questionable.

“In 2018, the latest year for which such data have been published, African-Americans made up 53% of known homicide offenders in the U.S. and commit about 60% of robberies, though they are 13% of the population,” Heather Mac Donald wrote in The Wall Street Journal this week.

“In 2018 there were 7,407 black homicide victims,” she went on. “Assuming a comparable number of victims last year, those nine unarmed black victims of police shootings represent 0.1% of all African-Americans killed in 2019. By contrast, a police officer is 18½ times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male is to be killed by a police officer.”

Mac Donald continued: “A 2015 Justice Department analysis of the Philadelphia Police Department found that white police officers were less likely than black or Hispanic officers to shoot unarmed black suspects. Research by Harvard economist Roland G. Fryer Jr. also found no evidence of racial discrimination in shootings. Any evidence to the contrary fails to take into account crime rates and civilian behavior before and during interactions with police.”

Fryer’s work has also determined that when police pull out of communities, black deaths tend to increase.

“The false narrative of systemic police bias resulted in targeted killings of officersduring the Obama presidency,” Mac Donald concluded.

While Instagram is censoring FBI crime stats as “hate speech,” on their official account they’re still promoting a “disabled trans model” named Aaron Philip who last year explicitly called for the “killing” of all “transphobes.”

The same content can be found mirrored here



  1. #FactsAreRacist! #RacistFactsAreRacist! #RacistFacts are “racist …

    True Speech repression, is our society’s worst problem. When reporting crimes, it is not permissible to [truthfully] refer to the suspect’s religious, ethnic or other …

  2. .

    Social media “community standards” don’t allow “content” that encourages hatred against protected groups.  As in hate speech laws *, it is not allowed to say anything negative about a “protected group” aka “minority” It is irrelevant if the disallowed “content” is factually true… 



Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *