The truth is: media strongly emphasize the race of alleged white perpetrators and minority victims.4
>US media clearly obey the race-aware German PresseKodex12.1: “When reporting crimes, it is not permissible to refer to the suspect‘s religious, ethnic or other minority membership “5
The pretense of color blindness in AP Style book, NYT media code and other countries’ media codes 6 is blatantly dishonest and false. Media gag orders do NOT color-blindly repress ALL race information. In reality, the honestly anti-white gag order of the German PresseKodex12.17 applies everywhere. Information about “minority” perps gets scrubbed8 But the race of white perpetrators with “minority” victims is strongly emphasized. Stirring prejudice against Whites by mentioning race of white suspects is all right.
Finding such White-against-Black crimes seem to be so rare that media, desperate for the Great White Defendant 9 regularly fall for huge number of proven hoaxes:.10. For every one crime accusation proven false (usually by surveillance camera evidence) we estimate there are many cases whose falsehood could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt11 12. After all, which “minority” person (or SJW 13) would side with a white devil and turn in a fellow minority “victim” as liar.
Googling “Black kills White” yields examples of White police killing Blacks.
the media has a responsibility to tell the public whether these men are accused of raping a white woman or a black woman. The media acts as if their responsibility is to suppress this knowledge, to avoid inflaming public opinion.
Of course, that only applies to white public opinion—during the Duke Rape Hoax, a black female Washington Post reporter wrote a story which began with the line “She was black, they were mostly white, and race and sex were in the air.” [Source]