NYT’s rare honesty: 3/4 of mass shooters are Black

Rarely do MSM admit to #RacistFacts. The NYT’s and other Ethics Style Books1 * 2 explicitly require that  media, police, teachers3*4, and social media users5 cover up true #RacistFacts in order not to stir up prejudices.

Over all, though, nearly three-fourths of victims and suspected assailants whose race could be identified were black. {Source: Multiple Shootings |NYT}

Click to Download Full Size 3/4 mass shooters MEME

mass_shooters_black_nyt

Such admissions, of course, appear, late in an article, hard to find, in convoluted language and never6 repeated, except by Colin Flaherty [VK, Minds, Twitter, Bitchute].

Note that the NYT actively distracts from blacks-as-criminal-shooters perspectives and totally focuses on blacks-as-victims issues.

Multiple Shootings |NYT

The Times compiled its list of 358 shootings with four or more casualties from largely crowd-sourced lists managed by the social media network Reddit and Gun Violence Archive, a nonprofit organization. The groups recently combined their efforts at the website gunviolencearchive.org.

Four or more casualties is a far broader measure than “mass shootings,” which are commonly defined as the killing of at least four people, not including the attacker. But it captures many victims who some criminologists say are too often ignored: people who might have died given a slightly different trajectory of a bullet, or less-sophisticated medical care.

Counting assailants among casualties increased the total number of cases by fewer than three dozen, most of them domestic violence shootings that ended in suicide. Hispanics were not separately identified, because police reports do not systematically identify victims and suspects by ethnicity, only by race.

There are 358 reasons for those 358 shootings, though some remain a mystery; in about a fourth of the cases, investigators have discerned no motive.

As for the rest, some patterns stand out. The fewest occurred while another felony, such as a burglary, was underway. Domestic violence shootings were nearly as infrequent, but were among the deadliest.

About a third were provoked by arguments, typically drug- or alcohol-fueled, often over petty grievances.[…]

nyt_small_2

Over all, though, nearly three-fourths of victims and suspected assailants whose race could be identified were black. Some experts suggest that helps explain why the drumbeat of dead and wounded does not inspire more outrage.

“Clearly, if it’s black-on-black, we don’t get the same attention because most people don’t identify with that. Most Americans are white,” said James Alan Fox, a professor of criminology at Northeastern University in Boston. “People think, ‘That’s not my world. That’s not going to happen to me.’ ”

Michael Nutter, a former Philadelphia mayor, who is black, said that society would not be so complacent if whites were dying from gun violence at the same rate as blacks.

Read all at https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/23/us/americas-overlooked-gun-violence.html

Related Articles:

Most Mass Shooters Are Black

Mass Shooting Videos:


Another unusual “racist”admission by NYT is here7.

nyt_meme2

More statistical information about Black crime rates in general

 

FOOTNOTES

  1. Media Speech Codes #1: USA, Canada, Germany – “Forbidden to …

    August 11, 1946: The [New York] Times introduced an editorial change announcing they will no longer refer to the race of persons suspected of a crime unless race is relevant to the story.

    62 years of systematic mandatory omission of true information. Thou shalt not tell the whole truth, like “Black man robbed, assaulted, raped”.

  2. The NYT is clearly insincere, because “White kills Black” is fit to print. The NYT is not concerned at all with hiding the race of white Christian crime suspects. The same insincere feigned color blindness can be found in the Associated Press Style Book, Reuters Hand Book, the National Association of Black Journalists Style Guide, the The Diversity Style Guide Society of Professional Journalists, Canada’s Globe and Mail Style Book (all discussed further below)


  3. Police gag order to protect national minorities from discrimination. Police of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia

    Minority membership is only mentioned in the internal and external reporting if it is absolutely necessary” . Media information, external and internal (!) police reporting must never discriminate nor stir up prejudices against minorities.  Police, like media,  must obey a written #PCGagOrder, to censor and hide information. Even in internal reports, stigmatizing information about minority

  4. #PCGagOrder
  5. Social media “community standards” don’t allow “content” that encourages hatred against protected groups.

    1. As in hate speech laws1 *2, it is not allowed to say anything negative about a “protected group” aka “minority3
    2. It is irrelevant if the disallowed “content” is factually true (#TrueSpeech).
    3. It is ok to encourage hate against an unprotected group4

    “Community standards”5 are just  another version of the #PCGagOrder re-formulated6. Community standards are another WRITTEN PROOF of repression of #TrueSpeech with PesseKodex12.1’s restrictions

    “Encouraging hatred” is interpreted very widely[12].  with typical PC dishonesty.   Negative facts might encourage “hatred” against “protected groups” aka “minorities”. The #PCGagOrder is officially enforced by YouTube and FaceBook. Forbidden to say anything negative about minorities, to avoid stirring up prejudices.   This #PCGagOrder is enforced by Hate speech laws, and social media.

  6. or very rarely
  7. NYT
    In a week of surreptitious reporting here (committing journalism can be a criminal offense in Zimbabwe), ordinary people said time and again that life had been better under the old, racist, white regime of what was then called Rhodesia.

    “When the country changed from Rhodesia to Zimbabwe, we were very excited,” one man, Kizita, told me in a village of mud-walled huts near this town in western Zimbabwe. “But we didn’t realize the ones we chased away were better and the ones we put in power would oppress us.”

    “It would have been better if whites had continued to rule because the money would have continued to come,” added a neighbor, a 58-year-old farmer named Isaac. “It was better under Rhodesia. Then we could get jobs. Things were cheaper in stores. Now we have no money, no food.”

    Over and over, I cringed as I heard Africans wax nostalgic about a nasty, oppressive regime run by a tiny white elite. Black Zimbabweans responded that at least that regime was more competent than today’s nasty, oppressive regime run by the tiny black elite that surrounds Mr. Mugabe.

    NYT

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top
%d bloggers like this: